Talk:Wii Virtual Console

July 9, 2007

Ok, I double checked. For NES Wikipedia has 71 games which is true as fas as my Wii says, but some other sites indicate that Super C used to be there and now isn't. Must investigate that. For Japan 94 seems correct. For Europe and Australia Wikipedia says 55 and 54 respectively because they are not counting SMB: Lost Levels because it was removed. So that makes a correct amount of 56 and 55. I'll have the other tables ready before tomorrow, did you all liked the new format? SBM 19:12, 9 July 2008 (MDT)

I'll let GORE make the call on that. I hardly touch the VC page and he does most of the maintenance on it. -Masamune 19:53, 9 July 2008 (MDT)

I approve. You already put in all of the dates for the old games so it won't be a real hassle to put up the dates of the new games as they come out. -GORE-ILLA 09:25, 10 July 2008 (MDT)

Yikes! I think we got confused. I used the DD/MM/YY format and Gore used the MM/DD/YY. Under which one should we compromise? SBM 14:48, 11 July 2008 (MDT)

Yeah, I didn't notice until I had finished editing it. I personally prefer MM/DD/YY although there's already quite a bit done with the DD/MM/YY... I could probably change them all to MM/DD/YY tonight if I had to though. -GORE-ILLA 16:35, 11 July 2008 (MDT)

Though it's worth noting that a YYYY-MM-DD format would, if I ever figure out how, work well with a sortable table. But who knows if I'll ever figure that out. -Masamune 16:48, 11 July 2008 (MDT)

I disagree with Gore, I think it's easier to change them all to DD/MM/YY than to MM/DD/YY, besides I thinks it's more used. SBM 20:47, 11 July 2008 (MDT)

Well yeah I didn't mean to say it would be easier, just that I could do it if that's what we agreed on.I dunno about it being more used though. DD/MM/YY just sounds awkward to me. Beng nitpicky, "September First, 2007" has always sounded natural to me rather than saying "First September 2007". -GORE-ILLA 07:40, 12 July 2008 (MDT)