Talk:MissingNo.

Oh God no, a glitch as a Pokémon? No way. I vote for deletion. Smash Brother 22:30, 30 October 2007 (MDT)

I think it might be worth keeping (providing we actually fill it out). Even Bulbapedia has it listed with a Pokemon template... though I think we should take it out of the extra superfluous categories like "Normal Type" and "Bird Type". I think what we really need to vote on is whether or not we should put it down as evolving into Kangaskhan. - Masamune 22:45, 30 October 2007 (MDT)

But it's just a code error, then what about all the other glitches in Pokémon and all the little glitches in every other game? Is glitch city a city? Is that really trustfull info or gives anything about the game other than the fact that it appears by accident? Smash Brother 22:50, 30 October 2007 (MDT)

Despite being a glitch, MissingNo. is a genuine, catchable and usable Pokemon that doesn't even require a hacking device to find. It has unique stats and movesets. It's also somewhat infamous as far as glitches go.

Yes, like most catchable Pokémon that also mess the graphics of the game. It was just a placeholder for info inside the catr. If Masamune wanted to do the categories based on the automatic infobox this screws all because we will have at least 5 ??? categories for just a glitch. Smash Brother 23:05, 30 October 2007 (MDT)